Evidence Assessment and Standards of Proof: a Messy Issue
Referencias
Accatino, D., 2011: «Certezas, dudas y propuestas en torno al estándar de la prueba penal», Revista de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, 37(2): 483-511.
Allen, R.J., 1988: «Idealization and Caricature in Comparative Scholarship», Northwestern University Law Review, 82(3): 785-807.
—1991: «The Nature of Juridical Proof», Cardozo Law Review, 13: 373-422.
—2014: «Burdens of Proof», Law, Probability and Risk, 13: 195-219.
Allen, R.J. et al., 1988: «The German Advantage in Civil Procedure: A Plea for More Details and Fewer Generalities in Comparative Scholarship», Northwestern University Law Review, 82(3): 705-762.
Allen, R.J. and Pardo, M.S., 2007: «The Problematic Value of Mathematical Models of Evidence», The Journal of Legal Studies, 36(1): 107-140.
—2019: «Relative Plausibility and Its Critics», The International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 23(1-2): 5-59.
Allen, R.J. and Stein, A., 2013: «Evidence, Probability, and the Burden of Proof», Arizona Law Review, 55: 557-602.
Anderson, T., Schum, D. & Twining, W., 2005: Analysis of Evidence, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barzun, C., 2008: «Rules of Weight», Notre Dame Law Review, 83(5): 1957-2017.
Bayón, J.C., 2008: «Epistemología, moral y prueba de los hechos: hacia un enfoque no benthamiano», Analisi e diritto, 2008: 15-34.
Bergeaud, A., 2010: Le droit à la preuve, Paris: L.G.D.J.
Bell, R.S., 1987: «Decision Theory and Due Process: A Critique of the Supreme Court’s Lawmaking for Burdens of Proof», Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 78: 557-585.
Bohlander, M., 2012: Principles of German Criminal Procedure, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Bredin, J.-D., 1996: «Le doute et l’intime conviction», Droits, 23: 21-29.
Bouloc, B., 2004: «La preuve en matière pénale», in Puigelier, C. (ed.), La preuve, Paris: Economica: 43-56.
Bovino, A., 2005: «Evidential Issues before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights», Sur. International Journal on Human Rights, 2: 56-79.
Caprioli, F., 2009: «L’accertamento della responsabilità penale “oltre ogni ragionevole dubbio”», Rivista italiana di diritto e procedura penale, 52: 51-92.
Cartier, M.-E., 2004: «Brèves remarques sur la preuve devant la Cour pénale internationale», in Puigelier, C. (ed.), La preuve, Paris: Economica: 57-72.
Castillo de la Torre, F., 2009: «Evidence, Proof and Judicial Review in Cartel Cases», World Competition, 32(4): 505-578.
Clermont, K. & Sherwin, E., 2002: «A Comparative View of Standards of Proof», The American Journal of Comparative Law, 50: 243-275. Cohen, L.J., 1977: The Probable and the Provable, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Coloma, R., 2012: «¿Realmente importa la sana crítica?», Revista Chilena de Derecho, 39(3): 753-781.
Coloma, R. and Agüero, C., 2014: «Lógica, ciencia y experiencia en la valoración de la prueba», Revista Chilena de Derecho, 41: 673-703.
Combs, N.A., 2010: Fact-Finding Without Facts. The Uncertain Evidentiary Foundations of International Criminal Convictions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cumiz, J.A., 2016: «El estándar de prueba “más allá de toda duda razonable” en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Penal Internacional», Revista de Derecho Penal y Procesal Penal, 2016/1: 5-21.
Cummins, R., 1975: «Functional Analysis», The Journal of Philosophy, 72: 741-765.
Dahlman, C., 2015: «The Felony Fallacy», Law, Probability and Risk, 14: 229-241.
Damaška, M., 1986: The Faces of Justice and State Authority. A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process, New Haven and Chicago: Yale University Press.
—1997a: Evidence Law Adrift, New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
—1997b: «The Uncertain Fate of Evidentiary Transplants: Anglo-American and Continental Experiments», The American Journal of Comparative Law, 45: 839-852.
—2003: «Epistemology and Legal Regulation of Proof», Law, Probability and Risk, 2: 117-130.
—2018: Evaluation of Evidence. Pre-Modern and Modern Approaches, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Della Torre, J., 2014: «Il lungo cammino della giurisprudenza italiana sull’“oltre ogni ragionevole dubbio”», Diritto Penale Contemporaneo (https://www.penalecontemporaneo.it), June 20, 2014.
Delmas-Marty, M., 1996: «La preuve pénale», Droits, 23: 53-65.
Ehrenberg, K.M., 2016: The Functions of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ferrajoli, L., 1989: Diritto e ragione. Teoria del garantismo penale, Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Ferrer, J., 2007: La valoración racional de la prueba, Madrid: Marcial Pons.
Fodor, J., 1985: «Fodor’s Guide to Mental Representation», Mind, 94: 76-100.
Friedman, L.M., 1975: The Legal System. A Social Science Perspective, New York: Russell Sage.
Gascón, M., 2010: Los hechos en el derecho. Bases argumentales de la prueba, 3rd ed., Madrid: Marcial Pons.
Gaskins, R., 2016: «The Legal Characterization of Facts at the International Criminal Court», in Feteris, E. et al. (eds.), Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law, The Hague: Eleven International Publishing: 59-68.
Goldman, A., 2002: «Quasi-Objective Bayesianism and Legal Evidence», Jurimetrics, 42: 237-260.
González, J., 2006: «La fundamentación de las sentencias y la sana crítica», Revista Chilena de Derecho, 33(1): 93-107.
González Lagier, D., 2013: Quaestio facti: Ensayos sobre prueba, causalidad y acción, Mexico: Fontamara.
Green, L., 1998: «The Functions of Law», Cogito, 12(2): 117-124.
Haack, S., 2014: Evidence Matters. Science, Proof, and Truth in the Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hans, V. & Germain, C., 2011: «The French Jury at a Crossroads», Chicago-Kent Law Review, 86(2): 737-768.
Iacoviello, F.M., 2006: «Lo standard probatorio dell’al di là di ogni ragionevole dubbio e il suo controllo in Cassazione», Cassazione penale, 46: 3869-3884.
Jackson, J.D. & Summers, S.J., 2012: The Internationalisation of Criminal Evidence. Beyond the Common Law and Civil Law Traditions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaplow, L., 2012: «Burden of Proof», The Yale Law Journal, 121: 738-859. Langbein, J.H., 1985: «The German Advantage in Civil Procedure», The University of Chicago Law Review, 52(4): 823-866.
Langbein, J.H., 1988: «Trashing “The German Advantage”», Northwestern University Law Review, 82(3): 763-784.
Laudan, L., 2005: «Por qué un estándar de prueba subjetivo y ambiguo no es un estándar», Doxa, 28: 95-113.
—2006: Truth, Error, and Criminal Law. An Essay in Legal Epistemology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lillquist, E., 2002: «Recasting Reasonable Doubt: Decision Theory and the Virtues of Variability», U. C. Davis Law Review, 36: 85-197.
Lluch, X.A., 2012: «La dosis de la prueba: entre el common law y el civil law», Doxa, 35: 173-200.
Mackor, A.R., 2016: «Improving Judicial Argumentation about Evidence in Dutch Unus Testis Cases», in Feteris, E. et al. (eds.), Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law, The Hague: Eleven International Publishing: 111-122.
Novak, M., 2016: «Arguing for Certainty in Criminal Decision-Making and the Rule of Law», in Feteris, E. et al. (eds.), Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law, The Hague: Eleven International Publishing: 147-157.
Padoa-Schioppa, A. (ed.), 1987: The Trial Jury in England, France, Germany 1700-1900, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
—1994, La giuria penale in Francia, Milano: LED.
—2003, Italia ed Europa nella storia del diritto, Bologna: il Mulino.
Parsons, T., 1951: The Social System, Glencoe: The Free Press.
Paúl, Á., 2012: «In Search of the Standards of Proof Applied by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights», Revista Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos, 55: 57-102.
Picinali, F., 2013: «Two Meanings of “Reasonableness”: Dispelling the “Floating” Reasonable Doubt», The Modern Law Review, 76(5): 845-875.
Putnam, H., 1981: Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
—1995: «Are Moral and Legal Values Made or Discovered?», Legal Theory, 1: 5-19.
Redmayne, M., 1999: «Standards of Proof in Civil Litigation», The Modern Law Review, 62: 167-195.
—2003: «Objective Probability and the Assessment of Evidence», Law, Probability and Risk, 2: 275- 294.
Roberts, P. & Zuckerman, A., 2010: Criminal Evidence, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schweizer, M., 2014: «Comparing Holistic and Atomistic Evaluation of Evidence», Law, Probability and Risk, 13: 65-89.
—2016: «The Civil Standard of Proof—What Is It, Actually?», The International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 20(3): 217-234. Stein, A., 2005: Foundations of Evidence Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taruffo, M., 1992: La prova dei fatti giuridici, Milano: Giuffrè.
—2003a: «Rethinking the Standards of Proof», The American Journal of Comparative Law, 51: 659-677.
—2003b: «Algunos comentarios sobre la valoración de la prueba», Discusiones, 3: 81-97.
—2009: La semplice verità. Il giudice e la costruzione dei fatti, Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Tillers, P. & Green, E.D. (eds.), 1988: Probability and Inference in the Law of Evidence, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Tribe, L.H., 1971: «Trial by Mathematics. Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process», Harvard Law Review, 84(6): 1329-1393.
Tuzet, G., 2020: «Assessment Criteria or Standards of Proof? An Effort in Clarification», Artificial Intelligence and Law, 28(1): 91-109.
Ubertis, G., 2013: «Razionalismo processuale e verità», Il giusto processo civile, 1/13: 325-333.
Vázquez, C. (ed.), 2013: Estándares de prueba y prueba científica: ensayos de epistemología jurídica, Madrid: Marcial Pons.
Verheij, B. et al., 2016: «Arguments, Scenarios and Probabilities: Connections Between Three Normative Frameworks for Evidential Reasoning», Law, Probability and Risk, 15: 35-70.
Whitman, J., 2008: The Origins of Reasonable Doubt. Theological Roots of the Criminal Trial, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Wright, L., 1973: «Functions», The Philosophical Review, 82: 139-168.
Enlaces refback
ISSN-e: 2604-6202
ISSN: 2660-4515