Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence: Methodological Reflections
Referencias
Allen, R.J. & B. Leiter, 2001: «Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence», in Virginia Law Review, 87(8): 1491-1550.
Allen, R.J. & M.S. Pardo, 2007: «Probability, Explanation, and Inference: A Reply», in The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 11: 307.
— 2019a: «Relative Plausibility and Its Critics», in The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 23(1- 2): 5-58
— 2019b: «Clarifying Relative Plausibility: A Rejoinder», in The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 23(1-2): 2-5-17.
Allen, R.J., 2020: «Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence Revisited», in this journal.
Cappelen, H., 2012: Philosophy without Intuitions, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Cohen, L.J., 1977: The Probable and the Provable, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Enoch, D., Spectre, L. and Fisher, T., 2012: «Statistical Evidence, Sensitivity, and the Legal Value of Knowledge», in Philosophy & Public Affairs, 40(3): 197-224.
Gettier, E., 1963: «Is Justified Ture Belief Knowledge?», in Analysis 23: 121.
Goldman, A.I., 1999: Knowledge in a Social World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
— 2002: «Quasi-Objective Bayesianism and Legal Evidence», in Jurimetrics, 42: 237.
— 2012: «Philosophical Naturalism and Intuitional Methodology», in Goldman, A.I. (ed.), Reliabilism and Contemporary Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haack, S., 2014: Evidence Matters: Science, Proof, and Truth in the Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harman, G., 1986: Change in View: Principles of Reasoning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kornblith, H., 1994: «What is Naturalistic Epistemology?», in Kornblith, H. (ed.), Naturalizing Epistemology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Laudan, L., 2008: Truth, Error, and Criminal Law: An Essay in Legal Epistemology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leiter, B., 2017: «Naturalism in Legal Philosophy», in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lawphil-naturalism/.
Lipton, P., 2004: Inference to the Best Explanation. London: Routledge.
Lycan W.G., 2006: «On the Gettier Problem Problem», in Epistemology Futures, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Moss, S., 2021: «Knowledge and Legal Proof» in Oxford Studies in Epistemology Vol. 7, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
National Research Council, 2009: Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward, Washington D.C: The National Academies Press.
Quine, W.V., 1969: «Epistemology Naturalized», in Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, New York:Columbia University Press.
Pardo, M.S., 2007: «Testimony», in Tulane Law Review, 82: 119.
— 2010: «The Gettier Problem and Legal Proof», in Legal Theory, 16: 37.
— 2018: «Safety vs. Sensitivity: Possible Worlds and the Law of Evidence», in Legal Theory, 24(1): 50-75.
— 2019: «The Paradoxes of Legal Proof: A Critical Guide», in Boston University Law Review, 99: 233.
Pardo, M.S. and Allen, R.J., 2008: «Juridical Proof and the Best Explanation», in Law & Philosophy, 27(3): 223-68.
Park, R.C., 2001: «Grand Perspectives on Evidence Law», in Virginia Law Review, 87: 2067.
Smith, M., 2018: «When Does Evidence Suffice for Conviction?», in Mind, 127(508): 1193-1218.
Williamson, T., 2002: Knowledge and its Limits, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Enlaces refback
ISSN-e: 2604-6202
ISSN: 2660-4515