Evidential reasoning, testimonial injustice and the fairness of the criminal trial
The article argues that the assessment of the relevance and of the probative value of an item of evidence is susceptible to an evaluation on moral grounds (such as fairness), rather than just to an evaluation on epistemic grounds (such as accuracy). In particular, the article shows that an assessment of relevance and of probative value is unfair, and renders the trial unfair, when this assessment instantiates epistemic injustice of the testimonial kind; and that it instantiates such an injustice when, due to identity prejudice against a social group to which one of the parties in the proceedings belongs, the evidence is assessed without considering the experience and stock of knowledge of this
party. The article offers several examples of this phenomenon. The upshot is that higher courts, whose role includes checking that proceedings have been fair, should dirty their hands more readily than they are currently doing with the evidential reasoning of the first-instance adjudicator. However, the focus should be on preventing unfairness, rather than treating it.
Palabras claveevidential reasoning, testimonial injustice, fairness, criminal trial, relevance, probative value
Akala (2018). Natives: Race and Class in the Ruins of Empire. Two Roads.
Anderson, T., Schum, D. and Twining, W. (2005). Analysis of Evidence (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Arcila-Valenzuela, M. and Páez, A. (2022). Testimonial Injustice: The Facts of the Matter. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-022-00662-w
Campbell, L., Ashworth, A. and Redmayne, M. (2019). The Criminal Process. Oxford University Press.
Casey, L. Baroness (2023). Final Report. An Independent Review Into the Standards of Behaviour and
Internal Culture of the Metropolitan Police Service. Retrieved August 8, 2023, from at https://www.met.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/downloads/met/about-us/baroness-casey-review/update-march-2023/baroness-casey-review-march-2023a.pdf
Coady, D. (2017). Epistemic Injustice as Distributive Injustice. In I. J. Kidd, J. Medina and G. Pohl- haus Jr. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice. Routledge.
Congdon, M. (2017). What’s Wrong with Epistemic Injustice? Harm, Vice, Objectification, Misrecognition. In I. J. Kidd, J. Medina and G. Pohlhaus Jr. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice. Routledge.
Chalmers, J., Leverick, F. and Munro, V. (2021). Why the Jury Is, and Should Still Be, Out on Rape Deliberation. Criminal Law Review, 9, 753-771.
Cohen, L. J. (1977). The Probable and the Provable. Oxford University Press.
Cohen, L. J. (1983). Freedom of Proof. In W. Twining (Ed.), Facts in Law. Franz Steiner Verlag GmbH.
Crown Prosecution Service (2021). Drug Offences, Legal Guidance. Retrieved June 15, 2023, from https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/drug-offences#:~:text=Possession%20with%20intent%20to%20supply,-Where%20the%20evidence&text=As%20with%20a%20simple%20possession,intent%20of%20the%20actual%20drug–
Daly, E., Smith, O., Bows, H., Brown, J., Chalmers, J., Cowan, S., Horvath, M., Leverick, F., Lovett, J., Munro, V. and Willmott, D. (2023). Myths About Myths? A Commentary on Thomas (2020) and the Question of Jury Rape Myth Acceptance. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 7(1), 189-200.
Dennis, I. (2020). The Law of Evidence (7th ed.). Thomson Reuters.
Doak, J. (2008). Victims’ Rights, Human Rights and Criminal Justice: Reconceiving the Role of Third Parties. Hart Publishing.
Dotson, K. (2012). A Cautionary Tale: On Limiting Epistemic Oppression. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 33(1), 24-47.
Duff, R. A. (2018). Fairness in Criminal Proceedings: Concluding Thoughts and Further Questions. In J. Jackson and S. Summers (Eds.), Obstacles to Fairness in Criminal Proceedings. Individual Rights and Institutional Reforms. Hart Publishing.
Fairclough, S. (2018). Speaking up for Injustice: Reconsidering the Provision of Special Measures through the Lens of Equality. Criminal Law Review, 1, 4-19.
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice. Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press.
Fricker, M. (2017). Evolving Concepts of Epistemic Injustice. In I. J. Kidd, J. Medina and G. Pohlhaus Jr. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice. Routledge.
Gerger, H., Kley, H. and Bohner, G. (2007). The Acceptance of Modern Myths about Sexual Aggression Scale: Development and Validation in German and English. Aggressive Behaviour, 33(5), 422-440.
Gonzales Rose, J. B. (2017). Toward a Critical Race Theory of Evidence. Minnesota Law Review, 101, 2243-2312.
Gonzales Rose, J. (2021). Race, Evidence, and Epistemic Injustice. In C. Dahlman, A. Stein and G. Tuzet (Eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Evidence Law. Oxford University Press.
Goss, R. (2016). Criminal Fair Trial Rights. Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Hart Publishing.
Griggs, M. (2021). Race, Rules, and Disregarded Reality. Ohio State Law Journal, 82(6), 931-951.
Home Office (2022). Permission to Work and Volunteering for Asylum Seekers. Guidance. Retrieved June 15, 2023, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/handling-applications-for-permission-to-take-employment-instruction/permission-to-work-and-volunteering-for-asylum-seekers-accessible-version
Hoyano, L. (2014). What is Balanced on the Scales of Justice? In Search of the Essence of the Right to a Fair Trial. Criminal Law Review, 1, 4-29.
Hoyano, L. (2015). Reforming the Adversarial Trial for Vulnerable Witnesses and Defendants. Criminal Law Review, 2, 107-129.
Hulley, S. and Young, T. (2022). Silence, Joint Enterprise and the Legal Trap. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 22(5), 714-732.
Hunter, R. C. (1996). Gender in Evidence: Masculine Norms vs Feminist Reforms. Harvard Women’s Law Journal, 19(1), 127-168.
Jackson, J. D. and Summers, S. J. (2012). The Internationalisation of Criminal Evidence. Beyond the Common Law and Civil Law Traditions. Cambridge University Press.
Jackson, J. and Summers, S. (2018). Introduction. In J. Jackson and S. Summers (Eds.), Obstacles to Fairness in Criminal Proceedings. Individual Rights and Institutional Reforms. Hart Publishing.
Jalloh, T. O. (2022). Does the Critical Scrutiny of Drill Constitute an Epistemic Injustice? British Journal of Aesthetics, 62(4), 633-651.
Johnson, A. (2022). Racial Discrimination—A Stocktake. Criminal Law Review, 2, 83-87.
Judicial College (2020). Crown Court Compendium. Part I: Jury and Trial Management and Summing Up. Retrieved June 15, 2023, from https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Crown-Court-Compendium-Part-I-December-2020-amended-01.02.21.pdf
Judicial College (2021). Equal Treatment Bench Book. Retrieved June 15, 2023, from https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Equal-Treatment-Bench-Book-April-2023-revision.pdf
Kaye, D. H. (1986). Quantifying Probative Value. Boston University Law Review, 66, 761-766.
Kinports, K. (1991). Evidence Engendered. University of Illinois Law Review, 413-456.
Lacey, N. (2022). Criminal Justice and Social (In)Justice. Retrieved June 15, 2023, from https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/116949/1/Lacey_criminal_justice.pdf
Lackey, J. (2020). False Confessions and Testimonial Injustice. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 110, 43-68.
Lackey, J. (2023). Criminal Testimonial Injustice. Oxford University Press.
Lammy, D. MP (2017). The Lammy Review: Final Report. An Independent Review Into the Treatment of, and Outcomes for, Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Individuals in the Criminal Justice System. Retrieved June 15, 2023, from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/643001/lammy-review-final-report.pdf
Law Commission (2023). Evidence in Sexual Offences Prosecutions. Consultation Paper 259, Retrieved July 27, 2023, from https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/evidence-in-sexual-offence-prosecutions/#:~:text=The%20consultation%20paper,-In%20our%20consultation&text=The%20proposed%20reforms%20have%20three,defendants%20receive%20a%20fair%20trial.
Lempert, R. O. (1977). Modeling Relevance. Michigan Law Review, 75(5/6), 1021-1057.
Leverick, F. (2020). What Do We Know about Rape Myths and Juror Decision Making? International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 24(3), 255-279.
MacCrimmon, M. (1991). The Social Construction of Reality and the Rules of Evidence. University of British Columbia Law Review, 25, 36-50.
MacCrimmon, M. (2001). What is Common about Common Sense: Cautionary Tales for Travelers Crossing Disciplinary Boundaries. Cardozo Law Review, 22, 1433-1460.
Medina, J. (2013). The Epistemology of Resistance. Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and Resistant Imaginations. Oxford University Press.
Ministry of Justice (2022). Diversity of the Judiciary: 2022 Statistics. Retrieved June 15, 2023, from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/diversity-of-the-judiciary-2022-statistics
Monteith, K. KC, Quinn, E., Dennis, A. L., Joseph-Salisbury, R., Kane, E., Addo, F. and McGourlay, C. (2022). Racial Bias and the Bench. A Response to the Judicial Diversity and Inclusion Strategy (2020-2025). Retrieved June 15, 2023, from https://documents.manchester.ac.uk/display.aspx?DocID=64125#:~:text=Racial%20Bias%20and%20the%20Bench%20was%20created%20in%20response%20to,judges%20and%20other%20legal%20professionals.
Nance, D. A. (2001). Naturalized Epistemology and the Critique of Evidence Theory. Virginia Law Review, 87(8), 1551-1618.
Nicolson, D. (2000). Gender, Epistemology and Ethics: Feminist Perspectives on Evidence Theory. In M. Childs and L. Ellison (Eds.), Feminist Perspectives on Evidence. Cavendish Publishing.
Ormerod, D. (2020). Racism in the Criminal Justice System. Criminal Law Review, 8, 659-662.
Owusu-Bempah, A. (2017). Defendant Participation in the Criminal Process. Routledge.
Owusu-Bempah, A. (2018). The Interpretation and Application of the Right to Effective Participation. International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 22(4), 321-341.
Owusu-Bempah, A. (2022a). The Irrelevance of Rap. Criminal Law Review, 2, 130-151.
Owusu-Bempah, A. (2022b). Prosecuting Rap: What Does the Case Law Tell Us? Popular Music, 41(1), 427-445.
Pattenden, R. (2009). The Standards of Review for Mistake of Fact in the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division. Criminal Law Review, 1, 15-30.
Picinali, F. (2012). Structuring Inferential Reasoning in Criminal Fact Finding: An Analogical Theory. Law, Probability and Risk, 11(2-3), 197-223.
Picinali, F. (2016a). Base-Rates of Negative Traits: Instructions for Use in Criminal Trials. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 33(1), 69-87.
Picinali, F. (2016b). Generalisations, Causal Relationships, and Moral Responsibility. International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 20, 121-135.
Pohlhaus, G., Jr., (2017). Varieties of Epistemic Injustice. In I. J. Kidd, J. Medina and G. Pohlhaus Jr. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice. Routledge.
Puddifoot, K. (2021). How Stereotypes Deceive Us. Oxford University Press.
Quirk, H. and Ormerod, D. (2022). The Draft Victims Bill. Criminal Law Review, 8, 621-625.
Redmayne, M. (2003). Myths, Relationships and Coincidences: The New Problems of Sexual History. International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 7(2), 75-101.
Redmayne, M. (2015). Character in the Criminal Trial. Oxford University Press.
Registry of the ECtHR (2022). Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Right to a Fair Trial (Criminal Limb). Retrieved June 15, 2023, from https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/guide_art_6_criminal_eng.pdf
Reece, H. (2013). Rape Myths: Is Elite Opinion Right and Popular Opinion Wrong? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 33(3), 445-473.
Roberts, P. (2022). Roberts and Zuckerman’s Criminal Evidence (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Saul, J. (2017). Implicit Bias, Stereotype Threat, and Epistemic Injustice. In I. J. Kidd, J. Medina and G. Pohlhaus Jr. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice. Routledge.
Scaife, R., Stafford, T., Bunge, A. and Holroyd, J. (2020). To Blame? The Effects of Moralized Feedback on Implicit Racial Bias. Collabra: Psychology, 6(1), art. 30.
Scheppele, K. L. (1994). Manners of Imagining the Real. Law and Social Inquiry, 19(4), 995-1022.
Schum, D. A. (2001). The Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning. Northwestern University Press.
Simon-Kerr, J. (2021). Relevance through a Feminist Lens. In C. Dahlman, A. Stein and G. Tuzet (Eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Evidence Law. Oxford University Press.
Sullivan, M. (2017). Epistemic Justice and the Law. In I. J. Kidd, J. Medina and G. Pohlhaus Jr. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice. Routledge.
Taggart, J. (2022). Vulnerable Defendants and the HMCTS Court-Appointed Intermediary Services. Criminal Law Review, 6, 432-447.
Tanovich, D. M. (2017). Regulating Inductive Reasoning in Sexual Assault Cases. In B. L. Berger, E. Cunliffe and J. Stribopoulos (Eds.), To Ensure that Justice is Done: Essays in Memory of Marc Rosenberg. Thomson Reuters.
Thayer, J. B. (1898). A Preliminary Treatise on Evidence at the Common Law. Little Brown and Co.
Thomas, C. (2020). The 21st Century Jury: Contempt, Bias and the Impact of Jury Service. Criminal Law Review, 11, 987-1011.
Toole, B. (2021). Recent Work in Standpoint Epistemology. Analysis Reviews, 81(2), 338-350.
Trechsel, S. (2005). Human Rights in Criminal Proceedings. Oxford University Press.
Trechsel, S. (2018). The Character of the Right to a Fair Trial. In J. Jackson and S. Summers (Eds.), Obstacles to Fairness in Criminal Proceedings. Individual Rights and Institutional Reforms. Hart Publishing.
Tremain, S. (2017). Knowing Disability, Differently. In In I. J. Kidd, J. Medina and G. Pohlhaus Jr. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice. Routledge.
Twining, W. (2006). Rethinking Evidence. Exploratory Essays (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Waite, L. (2017). Asylum Seekers and the Labour Market: Spaces of Discomfort and Hostility. Social Policy and Society, 16(4), 669-679.
Ward, T. and Fouladvand, S. (2021). Bodies of Knowledge and Robes of Expertise: Expert Evidence about Drugs, Gangs and Human Trafficking. Criminal Law Review, 6, 442-460.
Wasserman, D. T. (1991). The Morality of Statistical Proof and the Risk of Mistaken Liability. Cardozo Law Review, 13, 935-976.
Case law and legislation
Al-Khawaja and Tahery v United Kingdom [GC], No. 26766/05 and No. 22228/06, European Court of Human Rights, 15 December 2011.
Allan v United Kingdom, No. 48539/99, European Court of Human Rights, 5 November 2002.
Behrani v Albania, No. 847/05, European Court of Human Rights, 27 May 2010.
Bryant v State, 802 N.E.2d 486 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004).
Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1994/33/contents
Criminal Procedure Rules 2020 (United Kingdom). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/759/contents/made
DPP v Kilbourne (1973) AC 729 (HL)
English and Welsh Victims Bill 2022 (Draft). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/draft-victimsbill
European Convention on Human Rights, Rome, 4 November 1950. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/convention_eng
Human Rights Act 1998. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents
Jalloh v Germany [GC], No. 54810/00, European Court of Human Rights, 11 July 2006.
JL v Italy, No. 5671/16, European Court of Human Rights, 27 May 2021.
Khamidov v Russia, No. 72118/01, European Court of Human Rights, 15 November 2007.
Perez v France [GC], No. 47287/99, European Court of Human Rights, 12 January 2004.
Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/60/contents
R. v Horncastle  2 AC 373.
R. v Saleem  EWCA Crim 1923.
SC v UK, No. 60958/00, European Court of Human Rights, 15 June 2004 (2005).
Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1999/23/contents
Derechos de autor 2023 Federico Picinali
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.