Understanding and preventing testimonial injustice in criminal proceedings
A comment on Federico Picinali “Evidential reasoning, testimonial injustice and the fairness of the criminal trial”
Descargas
Resumen
Reflecting on Federico Picinali’s arguments in «Evidential Reasoning, Testimonial Injustice and the Fairness of the Criminal Trial», this paper aims to further understanding of the scope and implications of epistemic injustice in criminal trials, and the problem of biased evidential reasoning more generally. It demonstrates how legal rules can result in dismissal or oversight of the defendant’s stock of knowledge; offers support for Picinali’s contention that testimonial injustice to defendants interferes with the right to a fair trial, while questioning whether the same can be said of testimonial injustice to complainants; and considers who can cause, and be a victim of, testimonial injustice. The paper goes on to evaluate Picinali’s proposed measures to prevent testimonial injustice in evidential reasoning, while advocating for law reform to restrict the admissibility of rap music as evidence in criminal trials.
Palabras clave
Evidential reasoning, testimonial injustice, relevance, participation in criminal trials, trial fairnessCitas
Ahmed, A. (2023, November 22). «It risks miscarriages of justice»: MPs oppose rap lyrics being used as evidence in UK trials. The Guardian. Retrieved January 7, 2024, from https://www.theguardian.com/music/2023/nov/22/mps-call-for-change-in-rap-lyrics-being-used-as-evidence-in-uk-trials-nadiawhittome-kim-johnson-shami-chakrabarti-annie-mac
Arcila-Valenzuela, M. and Páez, A. (2022). Testimonial Injustice: The Facts of the Matter. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-022-00662-w
Black Barristers Network (2022). A Report on the Experience of Black Self-Employed Barristers. Retrieved January 7, 2024, from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5e4a84a6445a6a5feb10e912/t/5fb46fdcb9f79d34b0787d59/1605660645604/Black+Barristers+Network+-+A+Report+on+the+Experiences+of+Black+Self-Employed+Barristers+-+November+2020.pdf
Bucke, T., Street, R. and Brown, D. (1999). The Right to Silence: The Impact of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. Home Office Research Study No. 199.
Casey, L. Baroness (2023). Final Report: An Independent Review Into the Standards of Behaviour and Internal Culture of the Metropolitan Police Service. Retrieved January 7, 2024, from https://www.met.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/downloads/met/about-us/baroness-casey-review/update-march-2023/baroness-casey-review-march-2023a.pdf
Dunbar, A. and Kubrin, C. E. (2018). Imagining Violent Criminals: An Experimental Investigation of Music Stereotypes and Character Judgments. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 14(4), 507-528.
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press.
Fricker, M. (2023). Institutionalized Testimonial Injustices: The Construction of a Confession Myth. Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure, 9(1), 39-64.
Gonzales Rose, J. (2017). Toward a Critical Race Theory of Evidence. Minnesota Law Review, 101, 2243-2312.
Gonzales Rose, J. (2021). Race, Evidence, and Epistemic Injustice. In C. Dahlman, A. Stein and G. Tuzet (Eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Evidence Law (pp. 380-394). Oxford University Press.
Howard League for Penal Reform (2021). Making Black Lives Matter in the Criminal Justice System. Retrieved January 7, 2024, from https://howardleague.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/A-guide-for-antiracist-lawyers-1.pdf
Ilan, J. (2020). Digital Street Culture Decoded: Why Criminalizing Drill Music Is Street Illiterate and Counterproductive. The British Journal of Criminology, 60(4), 994-1013.
Jackson, J. D. and Summers, S. J. (2012). The Internationalisation of Criminal Evidence. Beyond the Common Law and Civil Law Traditions. Cambridge University Press.
Jalloh, T. O. (2022). Does the Critical Scrutiny of Drill Constitute an Epistemic Injustice? British Journal of Aesthetics, 62(4), 633-651.
Johnson, A. (2020, August 8). We Must Challenge Racism in the Courtroom. Each Other. Retrieved January 7, 2024, from https://eachother.org.uk/courtroom-racism-how-we-must-challenge-it-in-the-uk/
Judicial College (2023). Crown Court Compendium. Part I: Jury and Trial Management and Summing Up. Retrieved January 7, 2024, from https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Crown-Court-Compendium-Part-I.pdf
Lackey, J. (2023). Criminal Testimonial Injustice. Oxford University Press.
Lammy, D. MP (2017). The Lammy Review. Retrieved January 7, 2024, from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/643001/lammy-review-final-report.pdf
McGlynn, C. (2017). Rape Trials and Sexual History Evidence: Reforming the Law on Third-Party Evidence. Journal of Criminal Law, 81(5), 367-392.
Medina, J. (2011). The Relevance of Credibility Excess in a Proportional View of Epistemic Injustice: Differential Epistemic Authority and the Social Imaginary. Social Epistemology, 25(1), 15-35.
Ministry of Justice (2023). Diversity of the Judiciary: 2023 Statistics. Retrieved January 7, 2024, from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/diversity-of-the-judiciary-2023-statistics
Monteith, K. KC, Quinn, E., Dennis, A. L., Joseph-Salisbury, R., Kane, E., Addo, F. and McGourlay, C. (2022). Racial Bias and the Bench: A Response to the Judicial Diversity and Inclusion Strategy (2020-2025). Retrieved 7 January, 2024, from https://documents.manchester.ac.uk/display.aspx?DocID=64125#:~:text=Racial%20Bias%20and%20the%20Bench%20was%20created%20in%20response%20to,judges%20and%20other%20legal%20professionals
Nielson, E. and Dennis, A. L. (2019). Rap on Trial: Race, Lyrics and Guilt in America. The New Press.
Owusu-Bempah, A. (2018a). How to Reinstate the Right of Silence. In In J. J. Child and R. A. Duff (Eds.), Criminal Law Reform Now (pp. 270-278). Hart.
Owusu-Bempah, A. (2018b). The Interpretation and Application of the Right to Effective Participation. International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 22(4), 321-341.
Owusu-Bempah, A. (2020). Understanding the Barriers to Defendant Participation in Criminal Proceedings in England and Wales. Legal Studies, 40(4), 609-629.
Owusu-Bempah, A. (2022a). The Irrelevance of Rap. Criminal Law Review, 2, 130-151.
Owusu-Bempah, A. (2022b). Prosecuting Rap: What Does the Case Law Tell Us? Popular Music, 41(1), 427-445.
Phillips, C. and Brown, D. (1998). Entry into the Criminal Justice System: A Survey of Police Arrests and their Outcomes. Home Office Research Study No. 185.
Picinali, F. (2024). Evidential Reasoning, Testimonial Injustice and the Fairness of the Criminal Trial. Quaestio Facti. International Journal on Evidential Legal Reasoning, 6, 201-235.
Quirk, H. (2018). The Case for Restoring the Right of Silence. In J. J. Child and R. A. Duff (Eds.), Criminal Law Reform Now (pp. 253-269). Hart.
Redmayne, M. (2008). English Warnings. Cardozo Law Review, 30(3), 1047-1088.
Simon-Kerr, J. (2021). Relevance through a Feminist Lens. In C. Dahlman, A. Stein and G. Tuzet (Eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Evidence Law. Oxford University Press.
Sutton Trust (2019). Elitist Britain. Retrieved 7 January, 2024, from https://www.suttontrust.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Elitist-Britain-2019-Summary-Report.pdf
The Bar Council (2021). Race at the Bar: A Snapshot Report. Retrieved 7 January, 2024, from https://www.barcouncil.org.uk/static/d821c952-ec38-41b2-a41ebeea362b28e5/Race-at-the-Bar-Report-2021.pdf
Ward, T. and Fouladvand, S. (2021). Bodies of Knowledge and Robes of Expertise: Expert Evidence about Drugs, Gangs and Human Trafficking. Criminal Law Review, 6, 442-460.
Case law and legislation
Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1994/33/contents
Criminal Procedure Rules 2020. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/759/contents/made
Criminal Practice Directions 2023. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Criminal-Practice-Directions-2023.pdf
European Convention on Human Rights. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/convention_ENGYouth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1999/23/contents
Doorson v Netherlands, No. 20524/92, European Court of Human Rights, 26 March 1996. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-2799%22]}
R. v Hoare [2004] EWCA Crim 784. https://vlex.co.uk/vid/r-v-hoare-kevin-793729937
R. v Webber [2004] UKHL 1.
R. v Cowan [1996] QB 373.
SC v UK, No. 60958/00, European Court of Human Rights, 15 June 2004. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-106981%22]}
Stanford v UK, No. 16757/90, European Court of Human Rights, 23 February 1994. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57874%22]}
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i7.23007Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Abenaa Owusu-Bempah
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.