Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence: A Reply to Pardo, Spellman, Muffato, and Enoch
Referencias
Allen, R.J., 1994: «Factual ambiguity and a theory of evidence», in Northwestern Law Review, 88(2): 604-640.
Allen, R.J., 2011: «Rationality and the Taming of Complexity», in Alabama Law Review, 62(5): 1047- 1068 (2011).
Allen, R.J., 2014: «Burdens of Proof», in Law, Probability and Risk 13(3-4): 195-219.
Allen, R.J., 2015: «A note to my philosophical friends about expertise and legal systems», Humana. Mente Journal Of Philosophical Studies, 8(28):79-97.
Allen, R.J., 2017: «The nature of juridical proof: probability as a tool in plausible reasoning», in International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 21: 133-142.
Allen, R.J., 2021: «Naturalized epistemology and the law of evidence revisited», in Quaestio facti. Revista Internacional sobre Razonamiento Probatorio, 2: 1-32.
Allen, R.J. and Leiter, B., 2001: «Naturalized epistemology and the law of evidence», in Virginia Law Review, 87(8): 1491-1550.
Diamond, Shari S., Murphy, Beth and Rose, Mary R., 2015: «The “Kettleful of Law” in Real Jury Deliberations: Successes, Failures, and Next Steps», in Northwestern University Law Review: 106(4) 1537-1608.
Enoch, D., Spectre, L and Fisher, L., 2012: «Statistical evidence, sensitivity, and the legal value of knowledge», in Philosophy & Public Affairs, 40(3): 197-224.
Enoch, D. and Fisher, T., 2015: «Sense and sensitivity: Epistemic and instrumental approaches to statistical evidence», in Stanford Law Review, 67(3): 557-611.
Pardo, Michael S., 2018: «Safety vs. sensitivity: possible worlds and the law of evidence», in Legal Theory, 24 (1): 50–75.
Pardo, Michael S., 2019: «The paradoxes of legal proof: A Critical Guide», in Boston University Law Review, 99(1): 233-290.
Quine, Willard V.O., 1951: «Two dogmas of empiricism», in The Philosophical Review 60 (1): 20-43.
Enlaces refback
ISSN-e: 2604-6202
ISSN: 2660-4515