Accuracy and fairness – Siamese twins?

A Comment on Sarah Summers «Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial: Truth, Proof and Rights»

Autori

  • Thomas Weigend University of Cologne (Germany)

##submission.downloads##

Abstract

The author agrees with Sarah Summers’ view that a criminal judgment in a system of fair justice should be substantively accurate and at the same time should be the result of a fair process. The author argues, however, for keeping these two requirements apart because they are linked to different goals and may in individual cases conflict with each other.

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Duff, A., Farmer, L., Marshall, S., and Tadros, V. (2007). The Trial on Trial (Volume 3: Towards a Normative Theory of the Trial). Hart Publishing. 

Fuller, L.L. (1960). Adjudication in the Rule of Law. Proceedings of the American Society of International Law, 54, p. 1-8.

Hruschka, J. (2000). Die Unschuldsvermutung in der Rechtsphilosophie der Aufklärung. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 112, p. 285-300.

Lazarus, L. (2012). Positive Obligations and Criminal Justice: Duties To Protect Or Coerce. In L. Zedner and J. V. Roberts (Eds), Principles and Values in Criminal Law and Criminal Justice: Essays in Honour of Andrew Ashworth. Oxford University Press. 

Picinali, F. (2013). Two Meanings of Reasonableness: Dispelling the ‘Floating’ Reasonable Doubt. Modern Law Review, 76, p. 845-875. 

Stuckenberg, C.F. (1998). Untersuchungen zur Unschuldsvermutung. De Gruyter.

Summers, S. J. (2023). The Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial: Truth, Proof, and Rights. Quaestio facti: revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio, 4, p. 249-272.

Weigend, Th. (1989). Deliktsopfer und Strafverfahren. Duncker & Humblot.

Weigend, Th. (2014). Assuming that the Defendant is not Guilty: The Presumption of Innocence in the German System of Criminal Justice. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 8, p. 285-299.

Weigend, Th. (2018). Zur Reichweite der Unschuldsvermutung. In U. Stein et al. (eds), Systematik in Strafrechtswissenschaft und Gesetzgebung. Festschrift für Klaus Rogall zum 70. Geburtstag (p. 739-755). Duncker  & Humblot.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i5.22844

Pubblicato

16-06-2023

Come citare

Weigend, T. (2023). Accuracy and fairness – Siamese twins? A Comment on Sarah Summers «Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial: Truth, Proof and Rights». Quaestio Facti. Revista Internacional Sobre Razonamiento P, (5), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i5.22844