No. 3 (2022): Quaestio facti. International Journal on Evidential Legal Reasoning

Quaestio facti. International Journal on Evidential Legal Reasoning

Full Issue

PDF (esp (España))

Presentation

Presentación

Diego Dei Vecchi, Jordi Ferrer Beltrán
- PDF (esp (España))

Essays

Fundamental Rights, Judicial Discretion and Criminal Process: How the Regulation of Rights Affects the Achievement of the Procedure Goals

Pablo Larsen

13-48
- PDF (esp (España))
Philosophy of Mind and proof of mental facts

Daniel González Lagier

49-80
- PDF (esp (España))
Epistemic Justification, Robust Evidentialism, Legal Proof

Edgar Ramón Aguilera García

81-102
- PDF (esp (España))
Evidence, Standards and Burdens of Proof in the European Asylum System: A New Field for Evidence Scholars?

Elena Marchese

103-130
- PDF (esp (España))
"Let Me Cross the Wind With Documents": Proposals for Rethinking Documents Used as Evidence in the XXI century

Vitor de Paula Ramos

131-158
- PDF (esp (España))
The distinction between proof and preparatory access to information in civil procedure

Thomas Franz Vogt Geisse

159-174
- PDF (esp (España))
Evidential Powers of Amparo Judges. A guarantor of the epistemic correctness of the facts

Verónica Lorena Osornio Plata

175-216
- PDF (esp (España))
On the effectiveness of the Istanbul and Minnesota protocols in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.

Maria Elena Lumiento

217-249
- PDF (esp (España))

Conjectures and Refutations

Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence A Reply to Pardo, Spellman, Muffato, and Enoch

Ronald Allen

253-272
- PDF

Informe del PCAST

Report to the President. Forensic Science in Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature-Comparison Methods

PCAST. Consejo de Asesores del Presidente en Ciencia y Tecnología (USA)

275-480
- PDF (esp (España))

Science for Legal Proceedings

(Un-)Interpretability in Expert Evidence: An Inquiry into the Frontiers of Evidential Assessment

Alex Biedermann, Kyriakos N. Kotsoglou

483-517
- PDF

Iuris Prudentia

The Proof of intentional discrimination in Argentina’s Supreme Court jurisprudence. How to improve its regulation?

Alejo Joaquín Giles, Olivia Minatta

521-549
- PDF (esp (España))